e-lawrevision
word games and quizzes to aid your revision
 
Custom Search
 
   Home      Volenti non fit injuria hangman

 

Tort Law Revision Hangman on Volenti Non Fit Injuria

 

Volenti non fit injuria hangman

 
Clues: 
 
1. ___________v Weston - the checking of insurance cover demonstrated the claimant was unwilling to accept the legal risk.
2. ___________v Sumner - a photographer was injured at a horse show
3. Morris v _________ - the defence of volenti non fit injuria succeeded because the risk was so glaringly obvious.
4. ICI v __________ - the defence of volenti non fit injuria succeeded as the brothers acted in defiance of their employer's instructions.
5. In this case the defence was successful as there was no need to rescue.
6. According to this case and s.148(3) Road Traffic Act, the defence of volenti non fit injuria can not be raised where a person accepts a lift from a drunk driver.
7. Dann v ______________ the claimant accepted a lift from a drunk driver.
8. Condor v _________ - a participant in sport is taken to have accepted the risks inherent in the sport but not injuries which occur outside the rules of the game.
 
 
 
 
 
 
* * *
 
 
 
 
* * *
 

Tort Law Revision Hangman on the Defence of Volenti Non Fit Injuria